Categories
Forensics

Forensic Pathologists: Public Servants

In this second part of my three part series on forensic pathology, I will be exploring the role of the forensic pathologist in society at large. Of all the specialties, forensic pathology seems to be largely ignored and/or unknown to the medical students I have met. Certainly, the prospect of working with dead patients doesn’t appeal to the majority of medical students, but hopefully a review of what forensic pathologists do will remind everyone that we should not take for granted the important social role they fill. In her book Postmortem: How Medical Examiners Explain Suspicious Deaths, Stefan Timmermans puts it the following way:

“Death is not an individual but a social event. When, with a barely noticeable sigh, the last gasp of air is exhaled, the blood stops pulsating through arteries and veins, and neurons cease activating the brain, the life of a human organism has ended. Death is not official, however, until the community takes notice.”

Many practicing physicians are surprisingly hazy on the subject, which becomes a problem when these physicians improperly fill out death certificates (a common occurrence which drains public resources to straighten out) or fail to recognize deaths as suspicious and warranting investigation.

Medical examiners are usually certified forensic pathologists who have been appointed to the medical examiner position as an employee of the government. They serve a vital role in the government’s public health systems; if a public health danger emerges of an unknown nature and is killing members of the community, who better to solve this pressing puzzle than a medical examiner? When death occurs under unexpected or unknown circumstances, i.e. when it is suspicious, then the probability that a public health danger is lurking about increases. If we don’t know why people are dying, how do we know who is at risk? How can we mitigate the threat? It is the responsibility of the medical examiner to figure this out, whether the threat is a murderer, an infectious disease, a faulty product on the market, etc.

When death occurs under certain circumstances, the body and investigation come under the jurisdiction of the medical examiner. In fact, by law (in San Francisco at least), a medical examiner must investigate the following types of deaths: violent, sudden, unusual, unattended by a physician in the last 20 days or with no medical history, related to an accident (either old or recent), homicide, suicide, due to an infectious epidemic, anything due to criminal acts, all deaths in operating rooms or following surgery or a major medical procedure, all deaths in prisons, jails, or of a person under the control of a law enforcement agency. Some of these categories are purposefully vague, in order to encourage doctors and other agencies to contact the medical examiner if the death is questionable in any regard whatsoever.

Medical examiners have the responsibility to unearth public health threats as they investigate all of these unusual deaths. For example, it was medical examiners who helped identify the mysterious and deadly powder distributed through the U.S. Postal Service in 2001 as anthrax, and who determine infant deaths are caused by defective cribs on the market, and who do the initial work in identifying infectious disease epidemics.

Bacillus anthracis
A photomicrograph of Bacillus anthracis bacteria using Gram-stain technique, courtesy of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Public Health Image Library (PHIL)

Clearly, forensic pathology is essential in maintaining a safe and just society in modern times. Well trained medical examiners performing top-notch forensic work ensures the timely, correct identification of threats to the community. Their role as public servants should never be taken for granted. They may work behind the scenes, but their work is necessary for our society’s high standards of well-being.

 

Featured image:
the colour of blood by anjamation

Categories
Forensics Law

Forensic Pathology and Death Investigation in the United States

This piece is the first in a three part series on Forensic Pathology in the United States. I will focus on how death investigation works in this country, the critical role physicians play in the process, and how to fix the enormous shortcomings of our current system.

It is perhaps necessary to begin by distinguishing medical examiners from coroners. Coroners do not have to be medical doctors in most states, and are usually elected. Typically a sheriff or another member of law enforcement fills the role of coroner. The requirements for being a coroner vary, but in most states no intensive training is required. For example, in California (where I live), a coroner must take a 2 week course, after which he or she may write death certificates in traumatic injury cases. Coroners do not perform autopsies, but do have the final say regarding the cause of death. They may or may not send bodies out to contracted pathologists for autopsies, and may or may not follow the recommendations of the pathologists who perform the autopsies.

A medical examiner is, by definition, a medical doctor. He or she is usually board certified in forensic pathology with the American Board of Pathology. Becoming board certified requires 4 years of medical school, plus a 3-4 year residency in anatomic pathology, plus a one year fellowship in forensic pathology. Once this extensive training has been completed, the individual may perform autopsies and present evidence as a medical expert in a court of law.

In 2009, the National Academy of Sciences released a report entitled Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States:  A Path Forward, which outlines how death investigation in the United States is conducted. The report begins in the following manner: “Recognizing that significant improvements are needed in forensic science, Congress directed the National Academy of Sciences to undertake the study that led to this report.” Clearly, the government saw that there was a need to look into the way forensic science is practiced. As it stands, each state and each county has a different system put in place for death investigation. The following map shows this patchwork of systems:

coroners_map_624-984843ef9bf65fc47d2a04b4ae952caf047bfae6-s800-c85
Photo courtesy of NPR

 

Unfortunately, this means that where an individual dies determines the quality of investigation into his or her death. Many factors contribute to the quality of the investigation, including whether there is adequate funding for the coroner and/or medical examiner’s office, and whether the physician performing the autopsy happens to be board certified in forensic pathology. There are no national standards for this; the National Academy of Sciences report mentioned above states that “the hodgepodge and multiplicity of systems and controlling statutes makes standardization of performance difficult, if not impossible.” There is no proficiency testing for the individuals who carry out these investigations, which results in incompetent practitioners being able to work unnoticed for decades.

Occasionally, court cases with heavy media coverage will bring the glaring need for standardization front-and-center. Horror stories abound about lost body parts, bullet holes being overlooked, wrongful convictions, murderers walking free as a result of botched autopsies, etc.

In cases involving police brutality, conflicts of interest often arise because elected coroners usually have strong ties to law enforcement. If an individual in custody is beaten to death, or if there is a police shooting similar to the one making headlines now in Ferguson, Missouri, do we really want the person in charge of the body and/or in charge of the entire death investigation to be an ex- or current police officer?

PBS Frontline: Post Mortem aired in 2011 and took a look at the problems mentioned above. This program featured two forensic science professionals who shared their opinions about the deplorable state of death investigations in the United States:

“In this country, many medical-legal offices are producing garbage.”
-Vincent Dimaio, M.D., former Chief Medical Examiner, San Antonio, TX


“It amazes me that such an important aspect of our government as medical-legal death investigation doesn’t have accreditation.”
-Ross Zumwah, M.D., Chief Medical Examiner, New Mexico

Clearly, we need to improve on our processes, and as future physicians and citizens we need to understand the importance of forensic pathology and death investigation, for the sake of our communities at large and for the sake of the families of those who have passed away. Our patients do not stop being our patients after they pass away; everyone deserves the right to a proper investigation surrounding the circumstances of their death.

Featured image:
Forensics – Spurensuche by Margrit

References:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/NSTC/forensic_science___may_2014.pdf
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/post-mortem/map-death-in-america/
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/post-mortem/
https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/228091.pdf
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yFPW016ocXI/