Categories
General

Welcome, incoming first year medical students!

This fall, you have chosen to join a group of accomplished and intelligent individuals who include not only your classmates, but all physicians worldwide. Amongst your peers are Hippocrates, Galen, Haeckel, Hess, and other great thinkers in the history of medicine. Whether or not you have grand plans for the future, your contributions will have a lasting impact on others’ lives. For your past and for your future successes, congratulations!

Of course, the road to becoming a physician will be difficult. While most articles about starting medical school offer generic recommendations to address the challenges you will face, upperclassman mentors can give more useful tips that are specific to your school and local area. This is not meant to be a post advising what to do in the first year, but one celebrating the start of medical school. After all, dedicating yourself to medicine is something to be proud of.

Those of you looking for inspiration may want to peruse the Medical Commencement Archive, which features speeches delivered to graduating classes of past years. The speakers give life advice, encouragement, and personal philosophies about practicing medicine. These points can serve as a reference to develop your own beliefs about the values of medicine, and how to find meaning in a medical career.

William Ernest Henley captures the spirit of perseverance in his poem “Invictus,” published in 1888. Though the poem addresses his personal struggles, its message encourages readers to challenge their own doubts and fears. As you continue your medical training, hold onto the convictions that you have now, at the start of medical school. Concerns of family hardships, the role of medicine, the difficulty of medical training, and loss of self have persisted for years[1]. It is up to you to determine who you will be and what you will live for.

Invictus[2]

Out of the night that covers me,
Black as the pit from pole to pole,
I thank whatever gods may be
For my unconquerable soul.

In the fell clutch of circumstance
I have not winced nor cried aloud.
Under the bludgeonings of chance
My head is bloody, but unbowed.

Beyond this place of wrath and tears
Looms but the Horror of the shade,
And yet the menace of the years
Finds, and shall find me, unafraid.

It matters not how strait the gate,
How charged with punishments the scroll,
I am the master of my fate:
I am the captain of my soul.

 

References:

  1. Fields, SA and Toeffler WL. “Hopes and concerns of a first-year medical school class.” Medical Education 1993; 27:124-129.
  2. Reprinted as hosted on Poetry Foundation website. Www.poetryfoundation.org/poems-and-poets/poems/detail/51642. Accessed July 10, 2016.

Featured image By Mohamed CJ (Own work) [CC BY-SA 3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0)], via Wikimedia Commons

Categories
General

Thoughts After Your Long Hike

Congratulations, graduates and guests. I realize that we’re in New England, where unbridled pride is often an unwelcome party guest, but today is one of those times to celebrate proudly, loudly, and without a hint of ambivalence, whether you or your graduate are the first or the fiftieth physician in your family.

Guests: I’m sure that you have attended many commencement ceremonies before, from preschool through baccalaureate. Let me assure you that this day is different. To use an SAT-style analogy, four years of medical school is to eight semesters of college the way that a 20-mile hike in the Mojave Desert dragging a steamer trunk filled with lead bricks is to a stroll on the beach at Malibu with a cooler of Coronas. They share nothing but sand. To put it mildly, acceptance at and completion of, medical school is an achievement sui generis—one of a kind.

Congratulations to all of you. And if the pride thing is tough for you, how about gratitude? Graduates: if you haven’t already done so, it’s not too late to thank your family, loved ones, friends, and teachers for their support along the way. You each have elementary and high school teachers, and college and medical school professors who would cherish learning how they affected your life. So you are hereby encouraged to message them right now and for the remainder of these remarks. Really.

In that spirit of gratitude, thanks to Dean Compton for the invitation to speak today. Perhaps many of you are wondering why he did so, as am I. Seriously, I believe this invitation originated more than 9 years—and a few Deans—ago, when I called Steve Spielberg and David Nierenberg to see if Dartmouth might be interested in sending a few students to do clerkships at California Pacific Medical Center (CPMC) in San Francisco.

Little did I expect how quickly we would proceed and how strongly the relationship would grow, to the point that several hundred women and men of DMS have chosen—for reasons that remain a bit obscure—to forsake New Hampshire’s lovely winters and delightful mud seasons to spend a few months training with us.

Faculty: thank you for sharing your wonderful students with us. We enjoy seeing their greenpatched white coats roaming our halls and being challenged by their inquisitive minds and their upto-date knowledge. And, yes, that was a bad pun.

Graduates—fellow doctors: You have passed through intellectual, physical, emotional, and often financial challenges to get to this day. Now what? I have no idea. I never imagined that someday I would be delivering a commencement address as the CEO of a hospital. When I graduated from medical school, the thought of wearing a suit and tie gave me the heebie-jeebies.

Then again, I never imagined when I moved to San Francisco 40 years ago to go to medical school, that I’d spend the rest of my life there. Like the man says, “Stuff happens, most of which has now faded pleasantly into a soft, fragrant breeze on a warm June day.”

For example, as an internist, I’m pretty sure I made some difficult diagnoses in my career. Like all of you, I answered—I hope correctly—thousands of questions on hundreds of exams. I’ve written elaborate histories and physicals, formulated complex differential diagnoses, and dictated detailed procedure notes. Honestly, I cannot remember much about any of these.

But I do clearly remember a patient I sent home from the ED—to “protect” my friends on the admitting team upstairs and to cement my reputation as a “wall”—who should have been admitted. I remember a colleague pointing out gently that I had missed a grossly enlarged bladder in a man with incontinence.

I recall the day that a chief resident showed me a medical record in which I had pretentiously written that the EKG had no Osborn waves—so when the patient returned a few days later, having swallowed yet another tricyclic overdose, his paper chart still in the limbo of medical records, there was no comparison for his now-abnormal QT interval. But as far as I know, these—and countless other— mistakes that I made have remained secrets, so no one but me learned from them.

I remember the first time a manuscript that I had written was accepted for publication—albeit in an obscure journal that is long out of print. Of course there have also been rejections TNTC (too numerous to count). As well as a stern letter from the editors of the Annals of Internal Medicine warning me about salami science. And tersely dismissive grant reviews from study sections that led me to question whether academics and I were meant for each other. I surely didn’t realize that all of this lied ahead.

Most of all, I never expected to perform chest compressions on my dad on the airport floor in baggage claim in San Francisco, after he collapsed in front of me as if his bones had liquefied. So a welcoming son became an ER doc: I got down on my knees and pumped and breathed for 20 eternal minutes while waiting for the paramedics.

For sure, I didn’t expect that he would live happily for another 9 years, my first and thus far only successful out-of-hospital cardiac resuscitation. Those skills you have been taught will someday come in handy.

What have I learned from all of this? More importantly, what have I learned that might be worth sharing with you?

Be transparent. Admit and learn from your mistakes. Help keep others from making the same ones. Become the first generation of doctors to understand that an error disclosed once can become an error prevented forever.

Keep calm and carry on. Winter is coming. This next one may be the longest winter of your life, oh interns-to-be. During those shorter and darker days, when you may question why you chose medicine over law or business or who-knowswhat, try to fall back on your hard-earned and privileged place: that as a result of the choices you have made and the work you have done, you understand how we humans function. What happens to the food we eat, how we process the sounds we hear and the sights we see, how we extract oxygen from the air we breathe and pulse it to our fingers and toes…even what love might be. This knowledge is yours forever, and I promise that it can sustain you during long dark nights if you let it.

OK. This has been a lot, especially for those of you who accepted permission to text your gratitude. So if you haven’t been following closely, please remember one piece of advice from a guy with grey hair: Become better at paying attention. Our biggest enemy is going on auto-pilot. Pay more attention to your patient’s eyes than to the iPatient—you know, the one who lives in the electric health record and who now receives all too much of our consideration. Real patients have beating hearts and minds filled with doubts and concerns.

Peel back the dressing to examine the wound—that advice applies whether you’re going into surgery or psychiatry. As clinicians, people— strangers—will open their hearts to you, especially if you ask them to. And sometimes, all you need to say are those three magical words, “Hi. I’m Dr. Geisel.”

Be open to your patient’s vulnerability. Ask if something worries them. What you know to be a benign sebaceous cyst a patient might see as an incipient melanoma. Your reflux might be their heart attack.

Take the time to sit down. In a chair. Or on the side of the bed. I guarantee that the few extra seconds that it takes will improve your interactions with patients and enrich your experience.

Use your stethoscope to listen for the Rice Krispies Kids. You know, the ones that go snap, crackle, and pop. They can be found in the thorax and abdomen—but only if you are paying attention.

This same recommendation about paying attention applies to your loved ones. As physicians, we often rush around like acephalic poultry, and we too easily come to believe that our free time is too rare to share. Rather, it’s too precious not to.

And perhaps you too will have an experience like mine. When my dad—remember him?— was finally able to talk the day after his cardiac arrest, he was told what had happened on the airport floor. He smiled at me and made the inevitable parental joke: “Son, I’m sure glad you didn’t listen to me and go to law school.” So am I, and doctors, so are all of you, I hope.

Congratulations again! Go forth to breathe deeply and knowledgeably from the air we share with all of humanity, past, present, and future.

 

Warren S. Browner, MD, MPH

Dartmouth’s Geisel School of Medicine Commencement Address

Warren S. Browner, MD, MPH is Chief Executive Officer of California Pacific Medical Center. A board-certified internist, Dr. Browner is a Senior Scientist in the CPMC Research Institute; Clinical Professor of Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College; and Professor (adjunct) of Epidemiology & Biostatistics at University of California, San Francisco. Prior to joining CPMC in 2000, Dr. Browner was on the full-time faculty at UCSF for 15 years, serving as Chief of General Internal Medicine and Acting Chief of the Medical Service at the San Francisco VA Medical Center.  He has served as Executive Editor of the American Journal of Medicine for seven years. He has been a member of Federal panels for the National Institutes of Health, the Department of Veterans Affairs, and the Food and Drug Administration. Dr. Browner received a B.A. from Harvard College in 1975; an M.D. from UCSF in 1979; a Master’s degree in Public Health (M.P.H.) in Epidemiology from UC Berkeley in 1983; and completed a residency in internal medicine and a fellowship in clinical epidemiology at UCSF.

The Medical Commencement Archive Volume 3, 2016

Categories
General Lifestyle

Goals between 1st and 2nd Year

When we were young, summer days were our most free. Our neighborhoods suddenly became hives of activity; kids playing baseball in the streets, video game sessions lasting all day, trips to the pool, family vacations, and most importantly, no school. Those days of summer seemed too short, and during the long winter months when school seemed to stretch on forever, I often sat and daydreamed of the days when I could wear shorts and a t-shirt. For many, summer vacations can last through college, with time spent abroad or back home enjoying the comforts of their childhood. Medical school, however, changes the game.

For those who come straight to medical school from their undergraduate institutions, the last true summer might be the one between the first and second year of medical school. In fact, most schools give students several weeks off to decompress after the long struggle of first year. Therefore, it’s worth asking: what do we do with this time? With that question in mind, I went out and queried fellow students from all years, as well as several physicians in practice and in academia, in order to collect ideas. Not surprisingly, there were a huge variety of answers, but they divided into two basic camps. About half said to do something, anything, to prepare ourselves for our future careers, and the other half said to enjoy the last vestiges of our youth.

The arguments are valid on both sides of this debate. Amongst those who said to do something “productive,” about 75% said to, more specifically, gather experience in an area of interest. Whether through shadowing or more formal experiences such as research opportunities, the idea is to gain whatever knowledge and experience you can to make choosing a specialty easier. Additionally, these measured voices said, you will gain a little extra something on your CV that might impress residency programs. For instance, a friend who had an interest in mental health and addiction medicine spent the summer doing research in a major university setting. He applied months in advance and said the experience changed his life. On the other hand, the remaining 25% said to spend time studying for the Boards. “They’ll creep up on you quickly, so best to start early,” one professor told me. He suggested creating a plan of action for the summer, including high yield topics to review each week.

The “do nothing” crowd, or those on the other side of the argument, also had their say. Many advocated that this last summer is the perfect chance to do a few things that simply won’t be possible in the years ahead. “For those who enjoy traveling, take the chance to get away,” they repeated again and again.  A student who recently matched into PM&R told me that he went to Europe for 4 weeks, rode the train, met lots of great people, and “stayed as far away from studying as [he] could.” He added that this gave him the chance to recharge his batteries before tackling the challenges of second year and beyond. While traveling Europe might not be possible for all of us, finding ways to decompress should be. A family medicine physician who has spent 20 years in practice told me that he went home, saw family, and spent lots of time fishing.

In the end, there is no clear path. Just like with everything else, how to spend that last summer is a very individual choice. My own experience involved taking time off to rest and reflect, and also spending a month locked in a room with some fellow students crafting a business plan for a student-run free clinic, which, after a lot of work and fundraising, opened the next year. I also completed a 2 week internship in rural medicine. I wouldn’t change anything about the summer; both of those work experiences motivated me in different ways regarding the type of physician I want to become, while taking time to rest rejuvenated me for the trials ahead. No matter what you choose, remember to do what makes the most sense for you. If you need the rest, take the chance to get it. If you want to work on something you feel passionate about, do that. While it may seem like another multiple-choice question, in the end, there is no wrong answer.

Featured image:
travelling by Elvira S. Uzábal – elbeewa

Categories
Lecture The Medical Commencement Archive

Humanism in Medicine and Healthcare in the Community

Good afternoon, and thank you for inviting me to be your speaker today. My name is Paul Rothman, and I am the dean of the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and the CEO of Johns Hopkins Medicine. It’s my privilege to be here on this memorable occasion to celebrate you, the esteemed graduates of the Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Class of 2016.

First, I want to say congratulations. You should be incredibly proud of yourselves. You have succeeded in one of the country’s most prestigious and rigorous programs, which is a testament to your immense talent, intelligence and drive.

Whether you are moving on to a residency, a postdoc, a job in industry or another professional stepping stone, today opens up great possibilities for you. You are forging ahead in an era of unprecedented opportunities in science and medicine.

In 2016, we are on the verge of some astounding breakthroughs, thanks to increasingly sophisticated medical imaging tools, next-generation gene sequencing, computational modeling, and other technologies that allow us to obtain and analyze complex data sets.

I started my career in 1984, when our work as medical professionals was far different than it is today. Over the past 30 years, I have had the pleasure of witnessing stupefying advances in medicine—progress that has had enormous impact on how we diagnose disease, deliver health care and conduct health-related research.

The rate of progress should be even more stunning during your careers. Soon, your whole genome is going to be accessible on your iPhone. An EKG will be self-administered at home with a hand-held device, and an iWatch will monitor seizure activity. Highly accurate autonomous robots will assist surgeons in the OR. And health behaviors will be tracked so closely that we will know in real time whether patients are adhering to their treatment regimens. There’s no doubt that technological innovation will save many, many lives.

Which raises the question, as I look out at all of you newly minted doctors: What is the role of the human doctor in this brave new world of medicine, which threatens to reduce the patient to a data set and “doctoring” to an algorithm? How can we harness the power of technology without undermining the doctor-patient relationship?

I recently read a striking study by an assistant professor of medicine here at Northwestern named Enid Montague. She used videos to analyze eye-gaze patterns in the exam room and found that doctors who use electronic health records spend roughly onethird of each visit staring at the computer. Not only is that alienating, but it can mean that we doctors aren’t picking up on important non-verbal cues from our patients.

And the more sophisticated our medical technologies get, the more potential there is for this distancing effect. For example, a hand-held ultrasound is more precise than a traditional physical exam—be it percussing a patient’s abdomen to determine the size of the liver or putting a stethoscope to someone’s chest to listen for abnormal heart rhythms.

But the human touch is an important part of building trust between doctor and patient. Can you imagine a scenario in which a doctor did a physical exam without once actually laying hands on the patient?

I like to argue that technology serves to get the unneeded variation out while the physician is there to keep the needed variation in health care.

The computer can ensure that the diagnostic process is efficient and thorough, with all potential diagnoses considered. But the physician must be there to help interpret findings or to say, maybe that patient can’t afford that drug, or that treatment regimen is too complex for that patient to manage. We as human doctors can factor in so many subtle observations and make an appropriate judgment call.

In order to do that, we need to listen. William Osler, one of Johns Hopkins’ founding fathers, is famous for saying: “Listen to your patient. He is telling you the diagnosis.” And I would take this opportunity today to echo that advice to all of you.

Here’s the thing: I believe that most of us who go into this field start out compassionate— motivated to help our fellow humans and relieve suffering. I can tell you that’s what drew me to medicine, and I’m sure the same is true for you.

It used to be we would train residents out of this inclination to be humanistic—through impossibly grueling hours and a culture of browbeating. When my wife and I trained, we worked more than 100 hours a week, and it took us years to start feeling human again after that.

Fortunately, I believe medical schools have made great strides over the past decade in nurturing empathy. We’ve changed our selection criteria to attract more caring, well-rounded people, and our residents are now limited to a somewhat more humane 80-hour workweek.

The problem is that in trying to teach our trainees to be more humanistic, we’re going against the grain of society. In 2016, efficiency is the name of the game, so doctors’ visits and hospital stays are growing shorter, making it harder to form meaningful relationships with our patients. Furthermore, so much of our communication today is now mediated through technology. Think about it: People vet potential mates through online dating sites. Friends stay in touch over Facebook. We communicate with our officemates via email.

Health care is a service industry, so look at other service industries and you’ll see a trend of dramatic depersonalization over the past couple of decades. When was the last time you spoke to a human while making a travel reservation or depositing a check? I just read that Wendy’s is adding self-service ordering kiosks to all its restaurants this year. For better or worse, DIY gene testing is already on the scene. As younger generations enter the workforce, this trend will only intensify.

But here is the really good news about your generation, and this gives me a lot of hope. Even though millennials have been raised on technology, study after study shows that your generation is more community-minded than the Gen Xers and baby boomers who preceded you.

You’re more likely than previous generations to state that you want to be leaders in your communities and make a contribution to society, and roughly 70 percent of people your age spend time volunteering in a given year. Not only do you all have the idealism of youth, but you’re also matching that idealism with action. And it’s inspiring.

At Johns Hopkins, all our trainees participate in service projects, and I suspect that’s true for most of you as well—whether it’s providing free hepatitis B screenings for community members in Chicago’s Chinatown or donating your time to CLOCC, Northwestern’s Consortium to Lower Obesity in Chicago Children. In my view, the very best physicians are those who possess a service ethos—who are not just humanists, but humanitarians.

Recently, I was helping my daughter with her medical school applications, and one of the essay prompts included this quote from the late Nobel Laureate George Wald: “The trouble with living with contradictions is that one gets used to them. The time has come when physicians must think not only of treating patients but also of trying to help heal society, if only so that their work is not incompatible with … surrounding circumstances, partly of their own making.”

Let’s unpack that quote.

In American cities, long-standing systemic inequities mean that many members of our communities lack access to adequate health care, decent schools and other advantages that many of us here today take for granted. What Wald is saying is that we can’t be content to cure sick people and lecture them on how to stay well without also addressing these underlying social conditions that contribute to poor health and the glaring health disparities we see in our cities.

We cannot satisfy ourselves with doing one and not the other—particularly in light of the social unrest that has been happening here in Chicago and in my city, Baltimore, over the last year and a half following the deaths of Laquan McDonald and Freddie Gray. These and other events have provoked Americans to confront some difficult truths. Wherever your career takes you next, I ask that you try to channel those feelings into positive action.

After all, why put such herculean efforts into healing people and finding cures if we will stand for an environment that contributes to shortening their lives?

When we do make scientific advances, we have to ensure that everyone in our society—regardless of race or income—has equal access to the latest and greatest medicine has to offer.

In January, the director of our gynecologic oncology service at Johns Hopkins published an article looking at trends in the way we treat cancer of the uterus.

It used to be when you operated on a patient with early-stage uterine cancer, you did a hysterectomy by slicing open the abdomen. The incisions were large and sometimes could lead to infection, blood clots, major blood loss, etc. These days, minimally invasive surgery (laparoscopic or robotic) has become the standard of care, curing roughly two-thirds of these patients with far fewer complications than the old method.

At Johns Hopkins, we choose this method more than 90 percent of the time, unless there’s a complicating factor. Yet when our scientists looked at the national data, they found a troubling trend: African-American and Hispanic women are less likely to get the better, minimally invasive brand of surgery, as are patients who are on Medicaid or are uninsured.

  • I wish I could say this was a shocking finding, but unfortunately, it’s all too common. Here are a few startling facts on health inequity in the U.S. today:
    African-American adults are at least 50 percent more likely to die prematurely of heart disease or stroke than their white counterparts.
  • The prevalence of adult diabetes is higher among low-income adults and those without college degrees.
  • The infant mortality rate for non-Hispanic blacks is more than double the rate for non-Hispanic whites.
  • In Chicago, predominately white communities have much lower rates of overweight/obese children than communities that are predominantly African-American and Hispanic.
  • In the area surrounding The Johns Hopkins Hospital in Baltimore, the life expectancy changes dramatically from neighborhood to neighborhood— by as much as 20 years!

In 1966, Martin Luther King Jr. said, “Of all the forms of inequality, injustice in health care is the most shocking and inhumane.” So what can we—or, more specifically, you—do about it?

Any strategy health care professionals develop to address population health must address the root causes of poor health, including poverty. Of course, the problems associated with poverty are incredibly complex, and breaking the poverty cycle requires an approach with many prongs, beginning with education.

I don’t expect you all to have the answers right out of medical school. All I ask, as you set off on your quest to eradicate disease, is that you take seriously your role as leaders in the community. The degree you are earning today confers a measure of responsibility, and I have total faith that your generation will get us closer to solutions to these pressing problems.

As busy as we are, trying to make our mark on the profession and, by extension, “human health,” we can’t lose sight of the people in the very neighborhoods our institutions exist to serve. I believe the medical community has a real opportunity to lead in helping to heal our cities, conquer inequality and create better opportunities for all. That work starts with the humanity and compassion in each of you.

Again, I want to congratulate you for this terrific accomplishment. We know you are going to achieve great things. Thank you.

Paul B. Rothman is the Frances Watt Baker, M.D., and Lenox D. Baker Jr., M.D., Dean of the Medical Faculty, vice president for medicine of The Johns Hopkins University, and CEO of Johns Hopkins Medicine. As dean/CEO, Rothman oversees both the School of Medicine and the Johns Hopkins Health System, which encompasses six hospitals, hundreds of community physicians and a self-funded health plan.

Paul B. Rothman, MD
Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine Commencement Address

The Medical Commencement Archive
Volume 3, 2016

Categories
General Public Health

The Doctor as the Advocate

Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has.
– Margaret Mead

Doctors are at the forefront of society. They see the dark pits and abysses of humanity that the rest of us try to forget – those depths of despair that many of us will never experience.

As Medicine continues to change, so too does its definition of illness and what it means to be ‘sick.’ Illness means more than just a set of symptoms or a mark upon an X-Ray; it resides within the choices we make every day, the people we welcome into our lives and the jobs we labor for decades at a time. As medicine continues to encompass more and more of our everyday lives, so it takes on greater responsibility.

Advocacy was defined by Earnest et al. in the January 2010 issue of Academic Medicine as an ‘action by the physician to promote those social, economic, educational and political changes that ameliorate the suffering and threats to human health and well-being that he or she identifies through his or her professional work and expertise’ (3).

An article written in the 2014 edition of the AMA Journal of Ethics further divided the definition into two: agency which refers to working on behalf of a specific patient, and activism which is directed towards changing social conditions that impact our health (6). Although many doctors are comfortable with the direct care of their patients, what can often be forgotten is our social responsibility. Not only do we need to treat patients as individuals, but also as a group – as a community.

The doctor’s role goes beyond the hospital walls. The patient is not just the person sitting in the clinic, but the person next door, the young lady who goes to the shops, the schoolboy who drags his bag over his sullen shoulders every morning. Illness takes place in more than the patient’s body; it takes place in society, in the neighborhood, in the schools that cannot provide support and the families that can no longer cope.; what impacts our health? Is it a parasite within our bodies, a virus that has entered so far into our habitat? Or is it unemployment, poor housing, discrimination, social isolation, loneliness, and abuse? These types of vulnerabilities lead to much higher rates of both morbidity and mortality in those affected (4).

The doctor is the voice of those who do not have one. The status of the medical doctor has been respected throughout the centuries; the curer of ills, the bringer of life. While this is gradually changing in the new era of patient-centered care, it is still a prevalent idea.

The doctor should use this privilege and rank within society to fight for those who cannot. As a group, doctors can hold a lot of power within society. Here in the UK, several Royal Colleges have voiced their opinions in the mainstream media over a number of issues already; in 2015 the Royal College of Psychiatrists spoke out about the long distances many of their patients had to travel for support (8), while in 2013 the Royal College of Physicians highlighted the need to tackle obesity more rigorously (9).

These days it is much easier to be an advocate. All it takes is a few clicks on the laptop and you can enter into the sphere of social media. A quick search on Twitter will highlight numerous debates that are occurring amongst patients and doctors, nurses and pharmacists, families and politicians. The battle is no longer held in the debating arena, but within the public sphere.

There is another side to advocacy. Once one decides to expose themselves to the public sphere, they open the door to a hailstorm of criticism and disapproval. By stepping outside of their niche practice and showing their faces to the world, they invite a whole host of attacks. To counter such negative experiences, many medical organizations have offered advice for healthcare professionals who wish to take a bigger role within society.

For example, the Canadian Medical Protective Association (2) recommends doctors:

  • Approach the issue with transparency, professionalism, and integrity.
  • Work within approved channels of communication.
  • Discuss concerns, suggestions, and recommendations calmly.
  • Provide an informed perspective, and attempt to include the perspectives of patients and other healthcare professionals.
  • Persuade rather than threaten or menace others.
  • Remain open to alternative suggestions or solutions, and try to build on areas of consensus.

Another critique against advocacy is the question of the doctor overstepping her boundary. Is advocacy within the remits of the doctors’ role? There is after all a social contract between medicine and society; it is society that holds up the profession to the highest esteem, expecting them to abolish disease and alleviate suffering. A person does not take off their professional cloak the minute they leave the hospital grounds – rather, its presence can be felt in every setting, whether it be the local shop where they grab their newspaper or the primary school where they pick up their children; it is a type of respect that is rarely be found in other professions (4). Medicine and society are intricately linked, and to claim that the doctor’s job ends once the patient leaves the room is to be blind to the role of healthcare in people’s day-to-day lives.

Yet the role of advocacy is not a role that every doctor may wish to take on. Some doctors may fall into advocacy with burning desire to change the world, while others would prefer the calming atmosphere of the hospital room, with just themselves, their patient and a piece of paper in between. I believe advocacy was described best in 2011 when Dr Huddle, Professor of Medicine at the University of Alabama Birmingham, said that it “must remain an occasional and optional avocation in academic medicine, not a universal and mandatory commitment” (3).

On another level, we must be careful not to politicize medicine too far (5) – medicine is for the public and not just a puppet dancing on the strings of politicians. Medicine must speak for those who cannot, yet still maintain its autonomy. Certainly many of the issues that impact our health are heavily politicalized areas – from housing to employment to funding cuts. Doctors must be careful when speaking for their patients. They must not allow their words to become blinded by their biases. We must remember that the doctor’s duty is first and foremost towards her patients – to the public.

There are plenty of examples of advocacy out there –doctors who blog about the daily struggles of their patients, Twitter discussions about mental health and social care, and the clinicians who write books and articles pursuing public policies with an aim of building a more just, equal and ultimately healthier society.

So, how can you get involved? Grab a book, read a newspaper; join the debates on Twitter, pen an article, start a discussion – go out there and let your voice be heard.

Below are some examples:

The Seven Social Sins:
Wealth without work.
Pleasure without conscience.
Knowledge without character.
Commerce without morality.
Science without humanity.
Worship without sacrifice.
Politics without principle.
– Gandhi, 1925 (7)

References

  1. Oxford Dictionaries. Advocacy [Online]. Available at: http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/advocacy[Accessed: 4th January 2016]
  2. The Canadian Medical Protective Association. 2014. The physician voice: When advocacy leads to change [Online]. Available at: https://www.cmpa-acpm.ca/-/the-physician-voice-when-advocacy-leads-to-change[Accessed: 4th January 2016]
  3. Kanter, S.L. 2011. On Physician Advocacy. Academic Medicine. 86:1059-1060
  4. Dharamsi, S., Ho, A., Spadafora, S., Woollard, R. 2011. The Physician as Health Advocate: Translating the Quest for Social Responsibility Into Medical Education and Practice. Academic Medicine. 86:1108-1113
  5. Huddle, T.S. 2011. Perspective: Medical Professionalism and Medical Education Should Not Involve Commitments to Political Advocacy. Academic Medicine. 86:378-383
  6. Freeman, J. 2014. Advocacy by Physicians for Patients and for Social Change. AMA Journal of Ethics. 16:722-725
  7. Easwaran, Eknath(1989). The Compassionate Universe: The Power of the Individual to Heal the Environment. Tomales, CA: Nilgiri Press.
  8. Buchanan, M. 2015. Mental health patients sent ‘hundreds of miles’ for care [Online]. Available at: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-33535864 [Accessed: 17th January 2016]
  9. BBC News. 2013. NHS obesity action plea by Royal College of Physicians [Online]. Available at: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-20878210 [Accessed: 17th January 2016]

Featured Image:
Speak up, make your voice heard by Howard Lake

Categories
Lecture The Medical Commencement Archive

The Past, Present, and Future of Medicine

It is a special time in medicine.

This is a time of the most rapid transformation in generations! You have scientific knowledge and technical abilities that far surpass those of your predecessors. You can multitask better than most. I know– I’ve seen you on the wards and in clinics—whipping out your smart phones, clicking on answers to clever questions barely out of my mouth. Us older  physicians struggle to keep up with you.

What a privilege you have for a patient to say, “That’s my doctor!” You will care for thousands of patients during your careers. But remember, they will only see a small number of doctors. You will be very special to them in ways beyond your comprehension. They need an anchor, a belief that someone is thinking about and looking after them…and you will provide this without even knowing.

You will experience a better balance between your work and your family life than existed for our generation. You will no longer be such a slave to the profession in which family and friends who nourished us were too long neglected. Our multi-professional teams help us achieve this, with each member complementing and supporting each other. Such a balance is healthy, leads to better care and prevents burnout!

It is a challenging time in medicine.

The demographics are changing in our society. There is an increased demand for your services due to population growth and aging, as well as the arrival of healthcare reform. Soon, the majority of our nation’s population will be “ethnic minorities,” looking like New Mexico. Diversity brings a rich sharing of culture, language and values. But it also poses threats that could divide us. We must find
a way to overcome divides by race and ethnicity, by gender and sexual preference, by income and geographic isolation.

Your challenge is to bridge these divides, finding connections with patients far removed from your own upbringing, economic status, religious or ethnic beliefs. While we have the means to treat virtually everyone that crosses our doors, access to our care is not guaranteed—either because of transportation challenges, linguistic barriers, financial impediments or social marginalization of certain
groups.

Our nuclear families are shrinking as young people leave for schooling or for jobs. This leaves no grandmother around to offer guidance to a young, single mom about how to treat her feverish child in the middle of the night. In such an isolaisolation-
generating environment, clinics and emergency rooms often replace family for comfort, re-assurance and social connection. Some people feel so alienated, they have given up on the healthcare system except for late night runs to the emergency room for a neglected toothache, or an infected needle track, or for a sick teen who delayed treatment while waiting for access to the lone family car.

We will be challenged to gain skills and an understanding of domains far from our traditional areas of strength—population health, management of health teams, the business of medicine. Thus, our generation of physicians leaves you both with a legacy and a mess!

Medicine has a powerful history.

Look how rapidly our field has progressed in just a few generations and what a terrific time it is to enter the physician workforce.

First, let me recall some recent history: when your entered medical school four years ago. I’m sure the week you began medical school your grandma asked you, “What’s this bump on my arm?” You protested, “Grandma, I’m only a beginning medical student!” But she said, “Yes, I know, but just tell me what you think this is.” That’s when you found out that what you think of yourself in this
profession is not important—it’s what your family, your patients and your society thinks of you that is so very important.

There is an expectation of your competence and ability to heal which feels uncomfortable—an expectation you can’t fulfill. But, as time marches on, you’ll grow into these new clothes.

Now, let’s go back further in history and reflect on what doctors in New Mexico faced more than a century ago.

We begin with impotence in the face of diphtheria. In 1882, there were no immunizations against diphtheria, so the physician’s presence at the bedside WAS the medicine in his “doctor’s bag.”

Still, the cases were difficult:

Case 1- “I was called to bedside on Saturday. Found patient with difficult respiration and suppression of urine. On introduction of catheter, no urine was found in bladder. Performed tracheotomy; breathing very difficult; death in about 24 hours.”

Case 2 – “Patient a five year old…performed tracheostomy…lamp went out…operated with difficulty taking about ½ hour…spasms…died in about 12 hours.”

In Las Vegas, NM in 1914, doctors had many medicinal purposes for whiskey—to steady their own nerves, to use as anti-septic in the belief that they could kill off germs that cause diphtheria, even in kids, and as a pain killer. I relate to this last use, for I once had shingles, which felt like a hot branding iron on my side. I went to the local hospital and was prescribed narcotics, which didn’t
touch the pain. I was desperate. A colleague suggested I try alcohol. “I don’t drink,” I objected. But I bought a bottle of whiskey. It tasted terrible…and my pain disappeared. Swigging whiskey, I remained drunk for a week and felt no pain!

Prejudice and stigmatization were as rampant among our forebears as they are today with AIDS, mental illness, or in the attitudes of some toward immigrants. In 1904 a distinguished physician from Las Cruces warned of those with tuberculosis coming to NM for “the cure.” He said, “The army of tubercular invalids should be brought under control, promiscuous expectoration should be stopped
and every possible means taken to prevent these unfortunates from becoming a danger to the population… I most assuredly do believe that in return for the health-giving properties of our glorious climate, they should be willing to submit to some legal regulation!

This sounds remarkably like our national political dialogue today.

You have skills and tools for diagnosis and treatment that many of us on stage could only have dreamed of when we were students. Not long ago, when I was a student, we treated congestive heart failure by bleeding patients and tying tourniquets to their limbs to prevent too much venous blood returning to overwhelm their failing hearts. Today, you’re equipped with powerful diuretics, medicines
to lessen heart stress, and coronary catheters to unblock clogged arteries.

Not long ago we warehoused the mentally ill, the developmentally disabled and the tuberculous in sanatoriums. Today, with stronger therapeutic means at your disposal, and better understanding of the pathophysiology of disease, most of these individuals live at home or in the community.

And not long ago, at the turn of the last century, most health providers were physicians. Today, physicians make up less than 10% of the health workforce—for we train with and rely on multi-professional teams to better care for our patients. While we train mostly in isolation from other health professions, we will spend our professional careers in interdependent collaboration with a growing number of health professionals skilled in vital areas which complement our own skills. We depend upon pharmacists, nurses, physical therapists, occupational therapists and even community health workers.

And look what we face today. No matter what specialty you enter, the care you give will be affected by the social determinants of disease faced by your patients: educational attainment, income and poverty, access to nutritious food, yearning for social inclusion. These socioeconomic forces contribute more to health than all the medical care we provide. This is a humbling thought. But we’re
rising to the challenge. Community health workers, our frontline in addressing social determinants, are now hired for each of our primary care clinics. Our own Gwen Blueeyes sent me this note summarizing her work with one of our patients:

“Patient came to see me in clinic so I could help her obtain food. She appeared overwhelmed with her current situation. She said, “I’m losing my car at the end of this month because I’m behind on my car payments. I’m afraid I’ll be evicted because I’m unable to pay my rent. I receive some social security benefits, but it’s not enough to cover my living expenses. My  local churches couldn’t find me any assistance.

I did the following: Helped her complete her food voucher benefits application, connected her with “adopted families” to
help pay last month’s rent, helped her complete paperwork for the Income Support Division to help cover cost of her Medicare premiums, and scheduled an appointment for her with the hospital Patient Financial Services Office,
which I’ll also attend to give her moral support.”

Now THAT’s an example of a powerful
addition to our heath team!

You should all be engaged in health policy. I want you to promise me that whatever field you enter, you will ALWAYS ask of the patient coming to clinic or admitted to the hospital bed, “How could this visit or admission have been prevented?” Our Chief of Neurosurgery asked, “Why do so many patients from rural hospitals with strokes and head injuries have to be flown to our Hospital at enormous
expense to patients and to those rural hospitals?” He set up a telemedicine program to review head CT scans sent from rural sites so he could advise local physicians on which patients to send, and which could safely stay put in their home community.

A pediatric endocrinologist wondered why her diabetic patients in New Mexico had to travel so far to Albuquerque for checkups. Half her diabetic children were on insulin pumps, allowing them to use the internet to download their glucose readings and send them to Albuquerque for review. This doctor can now advise patients on fine-tuning their management in their homes, sharply reducing
their trips to Albuquerque.

One of your classmates noticed that despite the recommendation that all patients with congestive heart failure contact their doctor at the first sign they are retaining too much fluid—3 lb in a day or 5 lb in a week- when asked, 4 of 5 patients admitted with congestive failure on our service had no bathroom scale. So she is working with cardiology and our hospital administration to propose buying $20 digital scales for all discharged patients with congestive failure who don’t have scales, which is aimed at reducing re-admissions for this condition.

And finally, a medical student and resident on our inpatient service explored how they could have prevented the admission of two patients admitted to our service in diabetic ketoacidosis. Both were poor, on UNM Care, and since insulin was so expensive, they had to use our hospital pharmacy to get affordable insulin. The problem, they discovered, was that our UNM Pharmacy was only open
8-5 when the patients were at work. They worked at jobs without benefits and feared if they took off from work, they could lose their jobs. The student and resident presented their findings to the UNM Pharmacy which agreed to stay open after-hours. Different generations teach each other.

Like Jedis, we taught you the ancient ways of diagnosis–using the “scratch test” to assess liver size, tapping muscles to check for “myo-edema” to diagnose protein malnutrition, and observing “sighing respiration,” a sign of anxiety.

But you upstarts taught our generation how to use dynamic documentation, how to quickly pull up x-rays on the computer, and how to access the latest evidence on your iPhones in seconds.

Older and younger generations in medicine offer continuity and mutual learning. I experienced this in my own home when I bought my first iPhone. I was typing away with my thumbs when my son looked over and asked what I was doing. “I’m texting,” I said. “No you’re not,” he said. “What am I doing?” I asked. “You’re e-mailing!” he said. “What’s the difference?” I asked. He had to show me that
little texting icon. Don’t ask me about Twitter!

Finally…why is your class so great?

I interviewed faculty and staff who worked with you over the past 4 years. And their general
consensus was: “You’re just so damned nice!” Your class character has made a great impression on all of us.

You have to be the kindest, most mutually supportive, most community-minded class in a generation. The welfare of your classmates and their academic and professional success, not just your own achievement, meant something to you. In the community, you helped the homeless, the immigrants, the disabled, the elderly and youth at risk. You’ve increased access to a life-saving drug- Narcan- for opiate overdoses; you’ve testified at the state legislature for health improvement bills; you’ve helped communities fight youth obesity; you’ve brought a range of services to inner city school kids, from dental health to sex ed; you’ve organized one of the largest, free flu shot clinics imaginable (>3,000 received shots in our parking lot).

You’ve shown the power of medical students as leaders, reviving and sharply increasing participation in the Student Council as a force
for positive change in our academic health center. You’ve organized mentors within your class to help all pass the Boards! And during Match Day, instead of rushing the table to grab and open your residency match envelopes like most classes, you politely approached the table calmly, helping each other find your respective named envelopes.

These are the skills that predict success in our highly social, interdependent field of Medicine. I was touched by an e-mail I received from one of your schoolmates relating an experience she had during her first year PIE rotation in rural New Mexico. She was attending a school-based clinic near her clinical site. Through fresh eyes, she summarized her following interaction with a teen patient:

“I can’t get out of my mind a 16 year old I saw today. She wouldn’t look me in the eye, and sat in the exam room sort of slumped over. I asked “What’s going on?” “My stomach hurts and I have a headache,” she said. Then all this craziness
started pouring out. “I haven’t slept in days,” she said. “My aunt keeps getting incredibly drunk. Last night my uncle was beating her and my aunt was so drunk, she wandered away.” “I can’t concentrate… My grandfather is dying. I
just lost 3 family members to alcohol. My mom says there’s not enough room in her house for me. I was just
separated from my sister…the one person who understands me. I can’t call her—her phone’s been disconnected.
I only eat what they have here in school—I get one or two meals a day…there’s no food at home. Even when I do eat, I sometimes throw up…I can’t help it…I’m so tired.”
With my mouth gaping, I collected myself. I got her some extra food from the school cafeteria, gave her a little something to settle her stomach, gave her a hug, and referred her to New Horizons. Deep down, I wanted to adopt her. She said she trusted me. God, she trusted me!”

THESE are the qualities that our field is looking for. Class of 2016, you’ve got it!

 

Dr. Kaufman received his medical degree from the State University of New York, Brooklyn in 1969 and
is Board Certified in Internal Medicine and Family Practice. He served in the U.S. Indian Health Service,
caring for Sioux Indians in South Dakota and Pueblo and Navajo Indians in New Mexico, before joining the
Department of Family and Community Medicine at the University of New Mexico in 1974, where he has
remained throughout his career, providing leadership in teaching, research and clinical service. He was promoted
to full Professor in 1984 and Department Chair in 1993. In 2007, he was appointed as the first Vice
Chancellor for Community Health, and was promoted to Distinguished Professor in 2011.

Arthur Kaufman, MD
University of New Mexico
School of Medicine Commencement

The Medical Commencement Archive
Volume 3, 2016

Categories
Clinical Opinion

Mental Disorders: Are We Over Medicating?

In 1948, the World Health Organization (WHO) defined health as “a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being, and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity.” However, mental illnesses are not seen in the same light as physical illnesses. People who get labeled with psychiatric diagnoses often carry a heavy burden of social stigma regarding those diagnoses, and are generally uncomfortable disclosing and/or discussing them openly.

In ordinary conversation, it is not considered strange to mention that you had an appendectomy or discuss how you’ve been dealing with your diabetes for years. However, saying that you’ve been manic-depressive for years or that you’ve been desperately trying to overcome panic attacks is something that typically generates a negative response, and raises red flags for some people.

Why is mental health perceived so differently than somatic and physical health?

My inspiration for writing this piece was a debate about mental disorders held at the Emmanuel Centre in London, entitled: We’ve Overdosed. Psychiatrists and the Pharmaceutical Industry are to Blame for the Current Epidemic of Mental Disorders. Psychoanalyst Darian Leader, and accomplished author on the issue Will Self, argued for the “overdosed” side, while Dr. Declan Doogan and Professor Sir Simon Wessely, president of the Royal College of Psychiatrists, argued against it.

Is it true that mental disorders are made up by big pharma? Or is it just that we have a difficult time accepting that our psyche can, indeed, be a subject (or object, depending how you see it) of pathologic deviance and aberration? And that such aberration could and should be subjected to medical treatment?

Some critics view mental disorders as illnesses that have no definitive pathomorphological substrates. Are physicians overprescribing these agents to satisfy big pharma interests? Do they purposefully try to make the psychiatric bible (a.k.a. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders – DSM) thicker and thicker in each subsequent edition by bloating it with irrelevant and artificially fabricated diagnoses?

No one is claiming that every form of deviation from the “gold standard” of behavior (if such thing exists at all) is and should be proclaimed as a psychiatric disorder. No one is saying that every psychiatric disorder needs to be treated pharmacologically. No one is denying that many psychotropic drug treatments, unfortunately, fail among some patients. No one is saying that some classes of psychotropic drugs don’t induce debilitating side effects.

However, as future physicians we always have to remember that we will have a person with a problem sitting in front of us. This person will be seeking our help. We only have what is available to help them. We can only fight with the weapons that we have. Yes, sometimes treatment in psychiatry feels like we are trying to kill a mosquito with a rocket launcher. But it is the only thing we have got and for some it can be a salvation, regardless of the collateral damage.

My psychiatry professor once said, “if there is an equivalent of hell on Earth, it would be in a soul of a depressed person.”  I could not agree more.

Severe mental disease is not a joke. It is not something that can be solved with a thoughtful late afternoon conversation, by reading a line or two from Coehlo, or by reciting a poem by Neruda. Sure, activities like those are great adjuncts and can help ameliorate the situation to a degree, but people who are in trouble often need and demand much more from us.

Let’s not forget that when we’re talking about mental disease we are talking about the state of a diseased brain (physical) and mind (cognitive/psychiatric), which is most likely due to a neurochemical imbalance within the central nervous system circuits. This imbalance needs to be medically treated, especially in cases where it severely interferes with daily living. For some people, psychotropic medication is their only hope and the only chance they are going to get. For some people these medications perform miracles. We do not have a right to deny them such a possibility.

References

  1. Angermeyer MC, Matschinger H. The stigma of mental illness: effects of labelling on public attitudes towards people with mental disorder. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. 2003;108(4):304-9. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0447.2003.00150.x.
  2. Schomerus G, Schwahn C, Holzinger A, Corrigan PW, Grabe HJ, Carta MG, et al. Evolution of public attitudes about mental illness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. 2012;125(6):440-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2012.01826.x.
  3. Fournier JC, DeRubeis RJ, Hollon SD, Dimidjian S, Amsterdam JD, Shelton RC, et al. Antidepressant drug effects and depression severity: a patient-level meta-analysis. Jama. 2010;303(1):47-53. Epub 2010/01/07. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1943.
  4. Arroll B, Elley CR, Fishman T, Goodyear-Smith FA, Kenealy T, Blashki G, et al. Antidepressants versus placebo for depression in primary care. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2009(3). doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007954.
  5. Leucht C, Huhn M, Leucht S. Amitriptyline versus placebo for major depressive disorder. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2012;12:Cd009138. Epub 2012/12/14. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009138.pub2.

Featured image:
Reeve041788 by Otis Historical Archives National Museum of Health and Medicine